333 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-1982-2023 Date of decision: 12.05.2025 Yashpal Singh ...Petitioner Versus Satwinder Singh ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present: Mr. Sahil Koundal, Advocate for Mr. Harinder Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Mitul Singh Rana, Advocate for the respondent. **** VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL) 1. This is a revision petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the order dated 02.01.2023 (Annexure P- 1) passed by the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Mukerian, whereby the trial Court had allowed the application of the plaintiff filed under Order VI Rule 17 CPC. 2. It has been brought to the notice of this Court that main suit itself has been decided on 14.02.2025 and thus, the present revision petition has been rendered infructuous. 3. In view of the above, the present revision petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. 12.05.2025 (VIKAS BAHL) Pawan JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:- Yes/No PAWAN KUMAR 2025.05.12 16:35 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document