Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33975 (JHR)

ARVIND KUMAR GUPTA ALIAS ARBIND KUMAR GUPTA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cr.M.P./1837/2025 · 2025-10-10

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2025:JHHC:31401 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No.1837 of 2025 ------ Arvind Kumar Gupta @ Arbind Kumar Gupta, aged about 30 years, Son of Krishna Murari Lal Verma, Resident of Village-Abadganj, P.O. & P.S.-Daltonganj, Dist.-Palamau. … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Puja Kumari, Daughter of Deochand Mahto, Resident of Jaipur, P.O.-Jaipur, P.S.-Raniya, Dist.-Khunti. … Opposite Parties ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Aman Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Vishwanath Roy, Spl.P.P. ------ Order No:-03 Dated:-10-10-2025 Heard the parties. This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed by the petitioner with the prayer for restoration of Cr.M.P. No.1601 of 2022 to its original file which stood dismissed for non-compliance of peremptory order dated 12.09.2024. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that Cr.M.P. No.1601 of 2022 stood dismissed for non-compliance of peremptory order dated 12.09.2024 for filing the requisites within two weeks. It is next submitted that as the petitioner is residing in a remote area of Palamau district hence he could not gather the information the requirement for filing the requisites, hence, the the petitioner could not file the said requisites within the stipulated time; which resulted in dismissal of the said Cr.M.P. No.1601 of 2022 for non-compliance of peremptory order dated 12.09.2024. It is next submitted that non- compliance of peremptory order dated 12.09.2024 was neither deliberate nor intentional. It is also submitted that the petitioner has very good grounds to agitate in the said Cr.M.P. No.1601 of 2022 and unless the same is restored to its original file, the petitioner will be highly prejudiced. Hence, it is submitted that the Cr.M.P. No.1601 of 2022 be restored to its original file. Learned counsel appearing for the State has not raised any serious objection. Considering the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner and the facts of this case, Cr.M.P. No.1601 of 2022 is directed to be restored to its original file at the same stage at which it was before its dismissal. Registry is directed to list Cr.M.P. No.1601 of 2022 before the concerned Bench after a week. This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is disposed of accordingly. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 10/10/2025 Abhiraj/