State of H.P. Vs. Dinesh Verma and others Cr. MP(M) No. 1498 of 2025 22.11.2025 Present: Mr. Ajit Sharma, Deputy Advocate General, for the petitioner-State. Mr. Rajesh Mandhotra, Advocate, for the respondents. Cr. MP(M) No. 1498 of 2025 Heard. A perusal of the judgment passed by learned Special Judge, Kangra at Dharamshala (learned Trial Court) shows that the learned Trial Court acquitted the respondent/accused on the ground that the witnesses had made improvements, there were discrepancies in the plcaes where the reoveries were e昀昀ected and memos were prepared and there was enmity between the parties. Prima facie, the improvements were not got proved from the Investigating O昀케cer, defective investigation will not bene昀椀t the accused and enmity is a double edged weapon while it furnishes the motive for false implication, it also furnishes the motive for commission of crime, therefore, there are arguable points involved in the present appeal. Hence, leave to appeal is granted. Application stands disposed of. Cr. Appeal (Filing) No. 54888 of 2025 Cr. Appeal No. ______ of 2025 Since the application for leave to appeal has been allowed vide separte order passed in Cr.MP(M) 1498 of 2025. Appeal be registered. Mr. Rajesh Mandhotra, learned counsel appears and waives service of notice on behalf of respondent. Copy of the appeal be 昀椀led supplied to the learned defence counsel. Record has been received. Be listed for hearing in due course. (Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 22nd November, 2025 (Chander)