- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:3881 RFA No. 2138 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 2138 OF 2023 (INJ) BETWEEN: 1. SRI VIJAYRAJ S/O LATE AMAR CHAND AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS RESIDING AT NO. 6 HANUMAIAH REDDY ROAD ULSOOR, BANGALORE - 560 008. 2. SMT. UMRA BAI W/O VIJAYRAJ AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS 3. SMT. CHANDRA BAI W/O DILIP KUMAR AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS 4. RATANLAL S/O LATE HARJEE AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS 5. KISHANLAL AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS 6. UTTAM CHAND S/O GHAVER CHAND AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS MAJOR, Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:3881 RFA No. 2138 of 2023 ALL ARE R/AT NO. 6, HANUMAIAH REDDY ROAD ULSOOR, BANGALORE - 560 008. PLAINTIFFS NO.3 TO 6 ARE REP. BY G.P.A. HOLDER OF PLAINTIFFS NO.1. …APPELLANTS (BY SMT. VANAJAKSHI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. GOWRAMMA W/O SRI HEMANTH KUMAR BHARATHI MAJOR, 2. SRI HEMANTH KUMAR BHARATHI FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN MAJOR, BOTH ARE R/AT NO. B-24 NAVARATHNA APARTMENTS 17TH CROSS, MALLESHWARAM BANGALORE - 560 055. …RESPONDENTS THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF THE CPC, 1908. THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Counsel for the appellants has appeared in person and submits that short accommodation may be granted to comply with the office objections. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:3881 RFA No. 2138 of 2023 This Court is not inclined to grant time. The reason is simple. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the appeal was listed before the Registrar (P & H) and sufficient time was granted to comply with the office objections. Thereafter, the appeal was listed before the Court on 09.01.2025, on that day, finally a week's time was granted to comply with the office objections, failing which the appeal was ordered to be listed under the caption 'for dismissal of appeal for non-compliance of office objections' on 28.01.2025 The appeal is listed today under the caption 'for dismissal of appeal for non-compliance of office objections'. Despite granting sufficient time, the office objections are not complied with. It appears that the appellants are not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the Regular First Appeal is dismissed for non-compliance of office objections. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 10