Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33969 (RAJ)

SURESH KUMAR SHARMA S/O SH. SHAMBHU DAYAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/18414/2024 · 2025-02-07

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:5543] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18414/2024 Suresh Kumar Sharma S/o Sh. Shambhu Dayal, Aged About 59 Years, Resident Of Ward No.10, Khetri, Jhunjhunu (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of Devasthan, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. The Commissioner, Department Of Devasthan, Government Of Rajasthan, Udaipur. 3. The Assistant Commissioner, Department Of Devasthan Vrindavan, U.p. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Suresh Pareek Senior Counsel with Mr. Nichiket Pareek For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 07/02/2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is working in the respondent-department from last 32 years approximately. However, upon attaining the age of superannuation, qua the grievances of the petitioner and other persons who were on the same pedestal, representation were filed. Nonetheless, despite the same being filed even before the Chief Minister, a deaf ear is granted to the same, by the respondents/allied authorities. However, it is pleaded that instant petition can be disposed of with the liberty to file a representation in light of Pawan [2025:RJ-JP:5543] (2 of 2) [CW-18414/2024] Meena vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (SBCWP No. 1665/2024) and Circular issued by the Chief Secretary for the State of Rajasthan, dated 19.02.2024 (No. i- 10¼1½ izlq-@vuqq-&1@2012). This Court directs Commissioner, Department of Devsthan, Government of Rajasthan to consider the representation of the petitioner, if filed, and decide the same, strictly in accordance with law, expeditiously as per the ratio encapsulated in Pawan Meena (Supra) and Circular dated 19.02.2024. In light of the aforestated, the present petition is disposed of with the aforesaid liberty being granted. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J ANIL SHARMA /147