IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No. 956/2025 Decided on: 22.11.2025 Madan Lal …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ......Respondents ………………………………………………………………………………… Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner: Mr. Ravneet, Advocate, vice counsel. For the respondents: Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J Learned Additional Advocate General has placed on record a copy of office instructions dated 21.11.2025 from the Director of School Education, conveying that the consideration order has been passed in the case of the petitioner. The said consideration order has also been appended along with the office instructions. 2. Learned Additional Advocate General submitted that the consequential benefits, if any, in terms of the aforesaid consideration order, shall be released to the petitioner within six weeks from today. 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes 2 3. Taking note of above and the submission made by learned Additional Advocate General, this execution petition is disposed of. Liberty, however, is reserved to the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy, in accordance with law, for redressal of his surviving grievance, if any. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge November 22, 2025 (rohit)