HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CIVIL REVISION No. - 79 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 2. Shri Punit Gupta, learned counsel appearing for the respondents states that temporary administrator was appointed by the Waqf Board to maintain the Waqf for a period of one year. The said period has expired and at present, no Administrator is there to manage the Waqf. In case petitioner wants to be appointed as Administrator of the Waqf, he may file an application before the Waqf Board, in accordance with law. In case such an application is moved by the petitioner, the same shall be considered and decided by the Waqf Board. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection to the said proposition as stated by learned counsel for the respondents. 4. In view of the same, the writ petition stands disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to approach the Waqf Board for his appointment by moving an application and in case such an application is moved, the same shall be considered and decided after hearing all the concerned parties provided there is no other legal impediment. October 8, 2025 Rishabh Versus Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Shakil Ahmad Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Punit Kumar Gupta (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Syed Mohd Bilal .....Revisionist(s) Uttar Pradesh Shiya Central Waqf Board And 2 Other .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- RISHABH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad