TARSEM SINGH AND OTHERS v. TARLOCHAN KAUR AND OTHERS
RSA/3207/1997 · 2025-08-26
Amarinder Singh Grewal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 33965 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 33965 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
203 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA No. 3207 of 1997 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION: 26.08.2025 TARSEM SINGH AND ANOTHER ......APPELLANTS Vs.
TARLOCHAN KAUR AND OTHERS
.........RESPONDENTS
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL Present: None. ***** AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL, J.
1. As per the office report, notice issued to the appellants has been received back with the report that appellant No. 1 has been served, however, appellant No. 2 has expired.
2. As already noticed in the earlier order, the counsel earlier representing the appellants has since been elevated to the Bench.
3. Today, even on the third call, no one has put in appearance on behalf of either the appellants or the respondents.
4. It appears that the appellants are not interested in pursuing the present appeal.
5. Accordingly, the present appeal is dismissed for non- prosecution.
6. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand
disposed of.
AUGUST 26, 2025 (AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL) nitin JUDGE Whether Speaking Yes Whether Reportable No Nitin 2025.08.27 11:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document