2025:JHHC:25703 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No.187 of 2024 .... Chandan Singh, aged about 37 years, Son of Uday Shankar Singh, resident of House No.376A, Kalindi Basti, Jamshedpur, Agrico, P.O. Agrico & P.S.-Golmuri, District-East Singhbhum .… Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Deputy Commissioner, East Singhbhum having its office at Sakchi, P.O. & P.S.-Jamshedpur, District-East Singhbhum 3. Circle Officer, Dhalbhumghar having its office at Dhalbhumghar, P.O. & P.S.- Dhalbhumghar, District-East Singhbhum 4. Sub-Divisional Officer, Ghatsila, East Singhbhum having its office at Sakchi, P.O. & P.S.-Jamshedpur, District-East Singhbhum .... Respondents .... CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR For the Petitioner : Mr. Ankit Kumar, Adv. For the State : Ms. Nirupama, AC to Sr. SC-II .... 09/27.08.2025 1. The present writ petition has been filed for following reliefs:- (A) For issuance of writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the order dated 06.03.2023 passed by the Respondent no 3 in connection with Land Demarcation Case No 58 of 2022-23, whereby and whereunder the Respondent No 3 had refused to demarcate the land of the petitioner on account of the fact that the copy of the Register-II of the land of the petitioner is on torn condition. (B) For issuance of writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the order dated 06.03.2023 passed by the Respondent no 3 in connection with Land Demarcation Case No 59 of 2022-23, whereby and whereunder the Respondent No 3 had refused to demarcate the land of the petitioner on account of the fact that the copy of the Register-II of the land of the petitioner is on torn condition. (C) For issuance of writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the order dated 06.03.2023 passed by the Respondent no 3 in connection with Land Demarcation Case No 60 of 2022-23, whereby and whereunder the Respondent No 3 had refused to demarcate the land of the petitioner on account of the fact that the copy of the Register-II of the land of the petitioner is on torn condition. (D) Upon showing no cause or insufficient cause, further direct the respondent No 3 to demarcate the land of the petitioner. 2025:JHHC:25703 2 W.P.(C) No.187 of 2024 2. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with a liberty to work out his remedy in accordance with law. 3. Learned counsel for the other side has raised no objection. 4. Permission is accorded. 5. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed of with the aforesaid liberty. (Rajesh Kumar, J.) Shahid/ uploaded