HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 265 of 2025 Court No. - 87 HON'BLE LAKSHMI KANT SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard Mr. Divyanshu Pathak, learned counsel for revisionist, learned AGA representing State-opposite party no. 1 and perused the record. 2. Learned counsel for the revisionist submits that in persuasion of the impugned order, a recovery warrant has been issued against the revisionist. Against the said recovery warrant, the revisionist moved an application under Section 528 of the BNSS, wherein the matter was referred for mediation and the mediation proceedings have successfully concluded. 3. In view of the above learned counsel for the revisionist submits that he does not wish to press the instant criminal revision and prays that he may be permitted to withdraw the same. 4. Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel for the revisionist. 5. In view of the above conspectus, the present criminal revision is dismissed as withdrawn. September 9, 2026 Arti Versus Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Arvind Srivastava Iii, Divyanshu Pathak, Pratik Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Arpit Agarwal, G.A. (Lakshmi Kant Shukla,J.) Sumit Kumar Saxena .....Revisionist(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ARTI SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad