[2025:RJ-JP:12259] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15077/2024 Yunus Khan S/o Manudin Khan, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Bakhtawarpura, Police Station Bagad, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vikash Meena, Adv. For Mr. Tapeshwar Pal Singh Parmar, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Poonia, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 18/03/2025 1. Apprehending his arrest in connection with FIR No.127/2024, registered at Police Station Chirawa, District Jhunjhunu, for the offence(s) under Sections 420 and 406 of IPC, the accused- petitioner has preferred this criminal misc. bail application under Section 482 of B.N.S.S. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused- petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is contended that the accused-petitioner is ready and willing to co-operate with the investigation, custodial interrogation of the accused-petitioner is not required, therefore, the instant anticipatory bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the grant of anticipatory bail application and submitted the factual report. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. [2025:RJ-JP:12259] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-15077/2024] 5. The factual report alleges that the petitioner has obtained Rs.3,00,000/- from the complainant on the pretext of sending him to a foreign country. It is also alleged in the complaint that the petitioner has sent a forged ticket to the complainant and did not return the amount paid by the complainant. It is also alleged in the complaint that apart from the complainant, the petitioner has also duped Rs.2,32,000/- from Hanuman Swami and Sanjay Swami on the pretext of sending them to a foreign country. In the factual report, it is also indicated that the petitioner was involved in other 6 cases, out of which 5 cases are under Sections 420, 406 and 467 of IPC. The custodial interrogation of the accused- petitioner is required as original passports given by the complainant and other victims are yet to be recovered, therefore, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, the instant anticipatory bail application of the accused-petitioner is hereby by dismissed. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Ashwani Kr Srivastava /-149