Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33955 (RAJ)

MITTHAN SINGH S/O SHRI NAWAL SINGH v. SHRI NAVEEN JAIN, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY

CCP/1244/2023 · 2025-07-02

Maneesh Sharma, Manindra Mohan Shrivastava

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:24266-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 1244/2023 In D.B. Civil Special Appeal (Writ) No.521/2018 In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.20893/2013 Mitthan Singh S/o Shri Nawal Singh, Aged About 72 Years, R/o Vill. Rarah, Tehsil Kumher, District Bharatpur (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. Shri Naveen Jain, Principal Secretary, Education Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Shri Kanaram, Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner. 3. Shri Prem Singh Kuntal, District Education Officer, (Secondary-I) Bharatpur (Raj.) 4. The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ankit Agrawal, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Basant Singh Chhaba, Additional Advocate General assisted by Mr. Avinash Choudhary, Advocate, Mr. Hardik Singh, Advocate, Ms. Shruti Pareek, Advocate Mr. Ramdhan, Advocate HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order 02/07/2025 1. Heard. 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the respondents would submit that revised PPO order has now been issued on 02.06.2025 and copy of the same has also been produced for our perusal. [2025:RJ-JP:24266-DB] (2 of 2) [CCP-1244/2023] 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner also does not dispute the statement so made. 4. In that view of the matter, no further order is required to be passed. 5. The contempt petition is, accordingly, closed. Rule stands discharged. (MANEESH SHARMA),J (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),CJ Sanjay Kumawat/Seema/86