1 2025:CGHC:39885 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 5074 of 2024 1 - Khemraj Sahu S/o Abhay Ram Sahu Aged About 45 Years Occupation Posted Assistant Teacher (L.B.) Government Primary School Karhul, Sankul Vishrampur, Block Simga, District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, School Education Department Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Civil And Revenue District Raipur, Chhattisgarh- 490002 2 - Directorate, Public Instruction Department Of School Education, Indrawati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Collector And District Election Officer District Balodabazar-Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Joint Director Education, Division Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 5 - District Treasury Officer District Balodabazar-Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh. 6 - Block Education Officer Simga, Chhattisgarh. 7 - District Education Officer Balodabazar-Bhatapara, District Balodabazar- Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Barun Kumar Chakrabarty, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Arvind Dubey, Govt. Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J. Order on Board 08/08/2025 1. The petitioner has filed the present writ petition claiming the following reliefs: ALOK SHARMA Digitally signed by ALOK SHARMA Date: 2025.08.08 19:29:07 +0530 2 “10.1 This hon'ble Court may please be kind enough in calling the entire records related with the case. 10.2 This hon'ble Court may please be kind enough in directing the respondent authorities to cancel the impugned order dated 31.10.2023 (Annex P-1) thereby to reinstate the petitioner with consequential benefits maintaining his seniority in service. 10.3 Any other relief which this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case may kindly be granted.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would restricted his submissions to the extent that the petitioner has moved his representation for revocation of his application for resignation and he made representation on 13.05.2024 to the Respondent No. 3 but till date his representation has not been decided, therefore, the Respondent No. 3 may be directed to decide his pending representation within stipulated time frame in accordance with law. 3. On the other hand, learned counsel appearing for the respondent/State has no objection, if such a direction is being given to the authorities concerned to decide the pending representation of the petitioner in accordance with law within the stipulated time frame. 4. Considering the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the Respondent No. 3 is directed to take a decision on the pending representation of the petitioner dated 13.05.2024 (Annexure P/9) in accordance with law on its own merits as per the applicable rules and circulars within 60 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 3 5. The petitioner is directed to produce the copy of this order within two weeks from today to the Respondent No. 3. 6. With this observation, the present writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge Alok