Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33952 (AP)

GADIRAJU SRINIVASA RAJU, BHIMAVARAM. v. THATIKONDA VENKATA RADHA KUMAR, VISAKHAPATNAM-3,&ANR.

CRLRC/805/2010 · 2025-06-16

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI TUESDAY. THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 805 OF 2010 Revision filed under Sections 397 & 401 of Cr.P.C., against the Judgment of the Principal Junior Civil Judge -cum- Judicial First Class Magistrate, Bhimavaram in CO. No. 34 of 2007, dated 04-02-2010. Between: Gadiraju Srinivasa Raju, S/o Venkata Krishnam Raju, 33 Years, Business Bhimavaram, Bhimavaram. R/o rep. by his GPA Holder Gadiraju Venkatakrishnam Raju ...Petitioner/ Complainant AND 1. Thatikonda Venkata Radha Kumar, S/o Krishna Rao, Business,37 Years R/o F-3, Swarna Soudha Apartments, Opp: Raghu College, Ramanagar, Visakhapatnam -3 ...Accused rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of 2. The State of Andhra Pradesh A.P., at Amaravati ...Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI I. V. N. RAJU Counsel for the Respondents No.2: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: f / APHC010518872010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) r" P [3521] 1%^ ■J* TUESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 805/2010 Between: Gadiraju Srinivasa Raju, Bhimavaram. ...PETITIONER AND Thatikonda Venkata Radha Kumar Visakhapatnam and ...RESPONDENT(S ) others Counsel for the Petitioner: I. V. N. Raju Counsel for the Respondent{S): Public Prosecutor The Court made the following: ORDER: \ \ v Sri I.V.N. Raju, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the revision case inasmuch as he could not serve the notice on the respondent in spite of his best efforts. He submits that the learned Trial Court imposed only Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) towards the fine and out of that amount Rs.8,000/- (Rupees Eight Thousand Only) was ordered as compensation to the petitioner/complainant in a cheque I \ 2 Dr.YLR, J Crl.R.C.No.805 of 2012 Dated 17.06.2025 bounce case where the value of the cheque is Rs.1,50,000/- (Rupees One Lakh Fifty Thousand Only). Recording the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner and the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner on the petition 2. that he has withdrawn the matter. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as withdrawn. 3. H- There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- K. TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR / //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The PripcipaL Junior Civil Judge -cum- Judicial First Class (With Records) Magistrate, Bhihiavaram, West Godavari District. 2. One CC to Sri I. V. N. Raju, Advocate [OPUC] 3. The Section Officer, Criminal Section High Court of Andhra Pradesh, of Andhra Pradesh at 4. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court Amaravathi. [OUT] 5. Three CD Copies MV RAM \ 'I HIGH COURT \ \ DATED: 17/06/2025 ORDER CRLRC.No.805 of 2010 ^of ANDli^A 1 n SEP 2025 ml Col! ^ Current beciion dismissing the crlrc AS WITHDRAWN