APHC010516742008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI B MONDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI AND HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM APPEAL SUIT No.332 of 20n« Appeal filed under Section 96 of CPC, against the decree and Judgment passed in O.S.No.23 of 2000 dated 3-4-2008 on the file of the IV Additional District Judge, Tirupati, Chittoor District. Between: 1. T.V. Raghunadha Reddy, S/o, Sri T. Venkata Reddy (Died) ...Appellant 2. T.Ramesh Reddy, S/o Late Raghunadha Reddy, aged about 52 years, R/o.D.No.20-3-135, Sathyanarayana Puram, Tirumala Bypass Tirupathi, Tirupathi District-517507. Road ...Implead Petitioner/Proposed 2"^* Appellant (Appellant No.2 is brought on record as LRs of deceased Appellant No.1 vide Court order dated 9.9.2024, in I.A No.1/2024 in A.S.No.332 of 2008) AND Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams, Rep by its Executive Officer, T.T.D. Administrative Building, K.T. Road, Tirupati, Chittoor District. Tirupati ...Respondent w iA NO: 1 OF 2008(ASMP 818 OF 20n8> Petition under Section 151 of CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the execution of the decree in O.S.No.23 of 2000 dated 3-4- 2008 on the file of the IV Additional District Judge, Tirupati pending disposal of the appeal. Counsel for the Appellants : Sri D Praveen Kumar representing Sri D Kishore Kumar Counsel for the Respondent : Sri V.Dyumani (SC for TTD) The Court made the following order: r THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM A.S.N0.332/2QQ8 JUDGMENT: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari) Sri D.Praveen Kumar, learned counsel appellant’s counsel and prays for adjournment for appears for the no reason. 2. The docket proceedings shows that on 07.08.2023, the following order was passed: The appeal pertains to the year 2008. O.S was filed In the year 2000. 2. 3. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that fresh vakalat was filed, after seeking no objection from the previous counsel In the last week and prays for one (01) week time to prepare the matter. 4. Sri Abu! Mohamad Subhani, learned counsel, representing Sri C. Sindhu Kumari, learned counsel for the respondent also prays for adjournment. 5. The proceeding sheet shows that the matter was adjourned previously also on some dates on the request of either of the sides. Considering that the appeal pertains to the order 2008 and making It clear that no further adjournment shall be requested, listen 14.08.2023.” It was made clear that no further adjournment shall be Thereafter, on 14.08.2023, at the request of the appellant’s counsel time was granted to enable to file the English translation of documents in the regional language and to submit the 6. 3. requested. ,/ 2 paper book. Thereafter, so many dates were fixed and dates, the matter was adjourned at the on many request made either by the appellant's counsel or on his behalf. The paper book has not been filed. The English translation of the documents in the regional language has also not been filed though a period of more than two years has passed. The appeal is of the year 2008. 4. Considering the aforesaid orders as also the act of the appellant in not complying with the orders for filing of the and finding no justifiable reason to grant adjournment, we dismiss the appeal for non-prosecution. paper book 5. Accordingly, the Appeal Suit is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous pending, shall also stand closed. applications, if any Sd/- V DIWAKAR DEPUTY REGISTRAR .X //TRUE COPY// //^ SECTION OFFICER To 1. The IV Additional District Judge, Tirupati, Chittoor District, (with records if any) One CC to Sri D Kishore Kumar, Advocate [OPUC] One CC to Sri V.Dyumani (SC for TTD) Advocate [OPUC] One CC to Sri D Praveen Kumar, Advocate.[OPUC] The Section Officer, V.R Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi. (to dispatch the trial court records) Two CD Copies 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. TK vna HIGH COURT DATED:08/09/2025 JUDGMENT AS No.332 of 2008 -1 Cc’ 5( 2 5 SEP 2025 ^S^hirrent DISMISSING THE APPEAL SUIT FOR NON PROSECUTION