Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3395 (UTT)

ISRAR ALI v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/391/2021 · 2025-02-10

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:663 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPCRL No.391 of 2021 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. There is no representation for the petitioner. Mr. K.S. Bora, Deputy Advocate General and Mr. J.P. Kandpal, Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand. 2. An F.I.R. was lodged against the petitioner in Police Station Kotwali, Bazpur, District Udham Singh Nagar, on 24.02.2021, under Section 186, 353, 504 & 506 I.P.C. 3. This writ petition was filed by him for quashing the said F.I.R. The impugned F.I.R. is on record as Annexure No.1 to the writ petition. Perusal of the same reveals that ingredients of the offences levelled against the petitioner are made out. Whether the allegations made in the F.I.R. are correct or not, cannot be examined at this stage. It is matter of trial. 5. In view of parameters laid down by Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of M/s Neeharika Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Maharashtra & others, reported in AIR 2021 SC 1918, this Court does not find any reason to interfere with the impugned F.I.R. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition fails and is dismissed. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 10.02.2025 Arpan 2025:UHC:663