Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33946 (AP)

YADARAJU SATYANARYANA RAJU v. DR.BODAPTI PRABHAKARA RAO

CRP/1934/2022 · 2025-07-30

T C D Sekhar

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010517052022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3505] THURSDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1934/2022 Between: 1. YADARAJU SATYANARYANA RAJU, S/O. NARASIMHA RAJU, AGED 57 YEARS, RETTIRED EMPLOYEE, D.NO.66-2-7/4, NARASANNA NAGAR, KAKINADA. ...PETITIONER AND 1. DR BODAPTI PRABHAKARA RAO, S/o Late Venkateswarlu, Aged 63 years, Resident of Patttabhipuram, Guntur. ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased toMemorandum of Civil Revision Petition against the. Order in E.P.No.53 of 2020 in O.S.No.315 of 2018 dated 23-08-2022 on the file of the Court of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Kakinada IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to dispense with filing Xerox Copy of Plaint in O.S.NO. 315 of 2016 on the file of the Court of the Principal Senior Civil, Judge Kakinada and also writen statement and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to grant stay all further proceedings pursuant to the Order in E.P.No.53 of 2020 in O.S.No.315 of 2018 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Kakinada, pending disposal of the above CRP and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. E V V S RAVI KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent: 1. VENKATA DURGA RAO ANANTHA The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1934 of 2022 ORDER: It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the cause in the revision petition does not survive. 2. The said submission is placed on record. 3. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. 4. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ JUSTICE T.C.D. SEKHAR Dt: 31.07.2025 sj 142 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D. SEKHAR CRP No.1934 of 2022 Date 31.07.2025 sj