1 2025:CGHC:37393 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 7495 of 2025 1 - Smt. Geeta Pandey W/o Shri Sandeep Kumar Pandey Aged About 55 Years Occupation- Lecturer History, Government High School J.P. Colony Bela Block Division Korba, District Korba (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary School Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Director Public Instruction Directorate Chhattisgarh First Floor, C-Block Indiravati Bhavan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Joint Director Education Department Bilaspur District Bilaspur (C.G.) 4 - Collector And Chairman District Rationalization Committee Korba District Korba (C.G.) 5 - Sub-Divisional Magistrate (Revenue) Korba District Korba (C.G.) 6 - Block Education Officer Korba District Korba (C.G.) 7 - Smt. Mary Grazy Minj Promoted Principal Presently Posted At Government High School J.P. Colony Korba, Block Division Korba, District Korba (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Awadh Tripathi, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Suyashdhar Badgaiya, Deputy G.A. VEDPRAKASH DEWANGAN Digitally signed by VEDPRAKASH DEWANGAN Date: 2025.07.31 11:35:56 +0530 2 Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 30/07/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that raising her grievances against the rationalization order dated 05.06.2025, the petitioner has already made her representation before the District Rationalization Committee on 04.07.2025, which is still pending for its consideration and the authorities concerned may be directed to decide the pending representation dated 04.07.2025 of the petitioner within the stipulated time frame. 2. Learned counsel for the State has no objection, if such a direction is being made to decide the pending representation of the petitioner, in accordance with law. 3. On due consideration the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the District Rationalization Committee is directed to decide the pending representation of the petitioner dated 04.07.2025 (Annexure P/13) in accordance with law, as early as possible, after giving opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. 4. With the aforesaid observations, the present writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge ved