Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33940 (AP)

THE GENERAL MANAGER v. APPELLATE AUTHORITY UNDER PAYMENT OF GRATUITY ACT 1972

WP/22253/2003 · 2025-09-10

Ravi Cheemalapati

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010516472003 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 22253/2003 Between: 1. THE GENERAL MANAGER, KURNOOL DISTRICT COOPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LTD., KURNOOL. ...PETITIONER AND 1. APPELLATE AUTHORITY UNDER PAYMENT OF GRATUITY ACT 1972, CUM-DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF LABOUR., KURNOOL ZONE., KURNOOL. 2. CONTROLLING AUTHORITY UNDER PAYMENT OF GRATUITY ACT AND, ASST.COMMISSIONER OF LABOUR., KURNOOL. 3. B BALA SUBBAIAH DIED PER LR, H.NO.9/63., KRISHNA NAGAR., KURNOOL., KURNOOL DISTRICT. 4. B BHAGAVAN, S/O. LATE BALASUBBAIAH, R/O. 78/50-A, KRISHNA NAGAR, KURNOOL. (R-4 IS BROUGHT ON RECORD AS LR OF DECEASED R-3 AS PER C.O. DATED 21-08-12 IN WPMP 21084/11). ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue Writ order of direction more particularly a Writ of Mandamus declaring the order of the 2nd respondent herein in P.G.Case No.26/2002 dated 19-12-2002 as confirmed by the Ist Respondent in P.G.Case No.25/2003 dated 24-05-2003 as illegal and set aside the same and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2003(WPMP 27810 OF 2003 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Stay the withdrawal of the amount by the 3rd respondent paid by the Petitioner bank to the credit of P.G.Case No.25/2003 on the file of 1st Respondent, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition. IA NO: 1 OF 2004(WVMP 12 OF 2004 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order passed by this Hon'ble Court in WPMP.No.27810/2003 in the above Writ Petition dt: 22.10.2003 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2011(WPMP 21084 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to come on record as the legal representative of the deceased third respondent and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2011(WPMP 90813 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KOTESWARA RAO MUMMANENI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR LABOUR 2. R PRASAD 3. R V SUBBA RAO The Court made the following: ORDER: Sri Y.Sitha Ramanjaneyulu, learned counsel representing Sri Mummaneni Koteswara Rao, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and has become infructuous. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 11th September, 2025 RKS