Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No.1289 of 2025 Date of Decision: 08.12.2025 _____________________________________________________________________ Arun Sharma
……...Petitioner Versus Ms. M. Sudha Devi & Ors. …....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioners: Mr. Rahul Singh, Jagota, proxy counsel vice Mr. Virbahadur Verma, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol, Additional Advocate General with Mr. Ravi Chauhan and Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General, for the respondent-State. Mr. Aditya Singh Thakur, proxy counsel vice Mr. Vishwajeet Singh, Advocate, for responent No.3. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral) While placing on record communication dated 18.11.2025, issued under the signatures of Secretary, HP Rajya Chayan Aayog, Hamirpur, Himachal Pradesh, proxy counsel for the respondent- Chayan Ayog, states that name of the petitioner has been recommended for appointment to the post of Dental Mechanic, as such, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant petition.
2. Having carefully perused aforesaid document, which is taken on record, this Court finds merit in the contention of proxy counsel for the respondent-Chayan Ayog .
2
3. In view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant petition and accordingly, the same is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to ensure that appointment letter to the petitioner be issued to the post of Dental Mechanic, expeditiously, preferably within two weeks from today. Notice issued to the respondents are discharged. December 08, 2025
(Sandeep Sharma), (Sunil)
Judge