355. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Jagraj Singh State of Punjab and another CORAM: Present: MANJARI NEHRU KAUL 1. dated 25.04.2023 Arms Act, registered at Police Station (Annexure P on the basis of compromise between the parties. 2. directed to appear before the learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate to get their statements recorded regardin them. 3. Magistrate, IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM Date of decision: Jagraj Singh Versus State of Punjab and another HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL Mr. Tejinder Kataria, Advocate, fo Video Conferencing. Mr. Gautam Thapar, Senior DAG, Punjab. Mr. Rahul Verma, Advocate, for Ms. Kashish Sahni, Advocate, for respondent No.2. ----- MANJARI NEHRU KAUL, J. (ORAL) Prayer in the instant petition is for 25.04.2023, under Sections 336, 34 of IPC and Sections 25, 27 of , registered at Police Station City Ferozepur, District Ferozepur (Annexure P-1) and all consequential proceedings arising out of the same, s of compromise dated 28.02.2025 between the parties. Vide orders dated 18.03.2025 directed to appear before the learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate to get their statements recorded regarding the compromise arrived at, between Report has since been received from learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ferozepur, in pursuance of the directions of this Court, wherein, IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT RH CRM-M-14216-2025 Date of decision: 19.05.2025 .... Petitioner .... Respondents HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL Mr. Tejinder Kataria, Advocate, for the petitioner, through Mr. Gautam Thapar, Senior DAG, Punjab. hul Verma, Advocate, for , Advocate, for respondent No.2. is for quashing of FIR No.0167, 336, 34 of IPC and Sections 25, 27 of City Ferozepur, District Ferozepur proceedings arising out of the same, 28.02.2025 (Annexure P-2) arrived at, of this Court, the parties were directed to appear before the learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate to get g the compromise arrived at, between ince been received from learned Chief Judicial , in pursuance of the directions of this Court, wherein, , 336, 34 of IPC and Sections 25, 27 of City Ferozepur, District Ferozepur proceedings arising out of the same, , , the parties were directed to appear before the learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate to get g the compromise arrived at, between ince been received from learned Chief Judicial , in pursuance of the directions of this Court, wherein, SANJEEV KUMAR 2025.05.19 18:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-14216-2025 - 2 - the factum of the compromise arrived at between the parties stands verified and confirmed. As per the report, compromise has indeed been effected between the parties and the same is without any pressure or coercion and out of their free will and the complainant has also made statement to the effect that she would have no objection if the FIR qua the accused- petitioner is quashed. 4. The Trial Court has annexed the copies of statements of the parties, alongwith its report. 5. Learned State counsel too submits that there are no other accused other than the petitioner and respondent No.2 is the only aggrieved person in the FIR in question. 6. In view of the report of learned trial Court and the principles laid down by Hon’ble the Apex Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, and also by the Full Bench of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another, 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052, the instant petition is allowed. The aforesaid FIR and all consequential proceedings arising out of it, are quashed qua petitioner. 7. Needless to say the parties shall remain bound by the terms of compromise and their statements recorded before the Court below. (MANJARI NEHRU KAUL) JUDGE May 19, 2025 sanjeev Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No SANJEEV KUMAR 2025.05.19 18:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document