IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 5188/2024 Decided on: 18.11.2025 Netar Singh …Petitioner Versus HRTC & Anr. .…Respondents. ………………………………………………………………………………. Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner: Mr. Azmat Hayat Khan, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J This writ petition has been filed for the grant of following substantive relief: - “That writ of mandamus may kindly be issued, directing the respondent corporation to count the seniority of the petitioner from the initial date of their appointment as Booking Agents and he was working as Conductor as he was working as Conductor or in alternative, from the date when they completed 6 years of continuous service running with the buses, with all consequential benefits.” 2. In view of the reply filed by the respondents, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner may be 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes 2 permitted to withdraw the present writ petition, with liberty reserved to seek appropriate remedy for redressal of his grievance in accordance with law, including by filing a fresh petition after incorporating proper pleadings and reliefs. 2. Granting such permission, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 18th November, 2025(rohit)