IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No.1245 of 2025 Decided on: 2nd December, 2025 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Karan Singh …..Petitioner Versus Dr. Surinder Vashisht and another .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Rakesh Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. Munish Datwalia, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. C.N. Singh, Dr. Nidhi Singh, Mr. Anshul Gandhi and Mr. Ramesh Kumar, Advocates, for respondent No.1. Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for respondent No.2. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Petitioner alleges non-compliance of the decision rendered in Karan Singh Versus State of H.P. and another2. 2. At this stage, learned counsel for respondent No.1 has placed on record copy of office order issued by the respondents on 19.09.2025 and submits that the judgment in question has been complied with. 1 Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes 2 CWP No.10753 of 2025, decided on 11.07.2025 2 3. The above position is acknowledged by learned vice counsel appearing for the petitioner. In view of the office order issued by the respondents on 19.09.2025, the present contempt proceedings are closed. It is for the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy for the redressal of his surviving grievances, if any, in accordance with law. Jyotsna Rewal Dua December 02, 2025 Judge Mukesh