Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3393 (AP)

R.PRASADA RAO v. PRL.SEC.TECH.EDUCATION HYD AND 2 ORS

WP/17243/2002 · 2025-07-06

Ravi Cheemalapati

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010016742002 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] MONDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 17243/2002 Between: 1. R.PRASADA RAO, S/O RAMAKOTESWARA RAO, JUNIOR ASSISTANT, CHEMISTRY DEPARTMENT, BAPATLA ENGINEERING COLLEGE, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. PRL SEC TECH EDUCATION HYD AND 2 ORS, TECHNICAL EDUCATION, SECRETARIAT BUILDING, HYDERABAD 2. THE COMMISSIONER, TECHNICAL EDUCATION, D-BLOCK, 5TH AND 6TH FLOORS, G. RAMAKRISHNA GOVERNMENT OFFICE 3. THE SECRETARY, BAPATLA ENGINEERING COLLEGE, BAPATLA, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction or a writ particularly one in the nature of a writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents herein in not paying the annual increments due to the petitioner from the year 1993-94 onwards till date as bad in law, illegal, without jurisdiction and is violative of Article 14 of the Constitution and consequently direct the respondents to release the increments from the years 1993-94 till date and to pass such other orders in the interest of justice. IA NO: 1 OF 2002(WPMP 21647 OF 2002 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to dispose of the representations dated 14-11-1996, 1- 3-1997, 12-6-1997, 11-4-1998 made by the petitioner Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. RAMA RAO GHANTA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. B ADINARAYANA RAO The Court made the following: ORDER: Ms.Mahathi Saaveri, learned counsel representing Sri Ghanta Rama Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and has become infructuous. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 07th July, 2025 RKS