Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33928 (ALL)

SAMEERUL BEGAM v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/3875/2025 · 2025-04-29

Saurabh Shyam Shamshery

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:67250 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3875 of 2025 Petitioner :- Sameerul Begam Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anup Dhar Dubey Counsel for Respondent :- Anil Kumar,Ashish Kumar (Nagvanshi),C.S.C. Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J. 1. Heard Sri Anup Dhar Dubey, learned counsel for petitioner, Sri Ashish Kumar Nagwanshi, Advocate for Respondent-2 and Sri Anil Kumar, Advocate for Respondent-Bank. 2. Petitioner, an Assistant Teacher in a Primary School, was a guarantor to a loan given to Respondent-4, who was also an Assistant Teacher. It appears that Respondent-4 has made default in repayment of loan and for that a recovery proceeding was initiated against him. It is the case of petitioner that in the garb of above recovery proceeding against Respondent-4, petitioner’s bank account is seized and she is not allowed to withdraw money. 3. Learned counsel appearing for Respondent-Bank submits that there is no document which supports the claim of petitioner and in case under due procedure Bank proposes to seize account of petitioner, she will be communicated in accordance with law by a written communication. In absence of any written communication, there is no authority to seize the Bank account of petitioner. 4. In aforesaid circumstances, since apprehension of petitioner is clarified by learned counsel appearing for Respondent-Bank, therefore, this writ petition is accordingly disposed of. Order Date :- 30.4.2025 AK Digitally signed by :- AWADESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad