- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21568 WP No. 25103 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI WRIT PETITION NO. 25103 OF 2023 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SMT. GANGAMMA W/O LATE NARASIMHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, R/AT KATANAGENAHALLI VILLAGE, MANCHENAHALLI HOBLI, GAURIBIDNUR TALUK, CHICKABALLAPURA DIST, REPRESENTED BY HER G.P.A HOLDER SRI. DAVID G. S/O LATE GANGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/AT NO 165, WARD NO. 5 DINNEHOSAHALLI ROAD, PRASHANTH NAGARA, CHICKABALLAPUR-562101. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. BABAJAN S P, ADVOCATE-ABSENT) AND: 1. SMT. ROOPA D/O LATE NARASAMMA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/AT KAMAGANAHALLI VILLAGE, MANCHENAHALLI HOBLI, Digitally signed by REKHA R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21568 WP No. 25103 of 2023 GAURIBIDNUR TALUK, CHICKABALLAPUR DIST. 2. SMT. GANGAMMA D/O LATE RANAGAPPA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/AT GUYALAHALLI VILLAGE, MANCHENAHALLI HOBLI, GAURIBIDNUR TALUK, CHICKABALLAPUR DIST. 3. SMT. LAKSHMAMMA D/O LATE RANAGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/AT BANDAHALLI VILLAGE, NANDI HOBLI, CHICKABALLAPUR TALUK, CHICKABALLAPUR DIST. 4. SRI.G.V. RAVI S/O VENKATESHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, R/AT GUYALAHALLI VILLAGE, MANCHENAHALLI HOBLI, GAURIBIDNUR TALUK, CHICKABALLAPUR DIST. 5. SRI.NARASIMHAMURTHY S/O LATE VENKATARAVANAPPA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/AT BANDAHALLI VILLAGE, NANDI HOBLI, CHICKABALLAPURA TALUK, CHICKABALLAPUR DIST. 6. SRI K V GOPALAREDDY S/O LATE K G VENKATAREDDY, - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21568 WP No. 25103 of 2023 AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/AT KAMAGANAHALLI VILLAGE, MANCHENAHALLI HOBLI, GAURIBIDNUR TALUK, CHICKABALLAPUR DIST. …RESPONDENTS (NIL) THIS WP IS FILED PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS FROM THE LEARNED SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, GOWRIBIDANUR, AND SET ASIDE THE ORDERS PASSED IN P.C.R.NO.01/2022 DTD 30.09.2023 AND ALLOW THE PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER HEREIN, ALLOWING THIS WRIT PETITION. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MS JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI ORAL ORDER No representation for petitioner. No representation for petitioner even in the afternoon session. On 19.11.2024, a conditional order was passed to the effect that if office objections are not complied within one week, necessary orders would be passed for dismissal of petition. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21568 WP No. 25103 of 2023 Despite the same, office objections are not complied with. It appears petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, petition is dismissed for default. Sd/- (J.M.KHAZI) JUDGE RR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 15