APHC010016782005 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 18199/2005 Between: 1. S.A.RAHEEM, NANDYALA DIVISION, KURNOOL DISTRICT., S/O.LATE S.KHAJA MOHIDDIN, ADDL.ASST.ENGINEER (RETD), A.P.C.P.D.C.L. (OPERATION), UYYALAWADA, NANDYALA DIVISION, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. CENTRAL POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF A P HYD 2 OTHER, REP BY ITS CHAIRMAN & MANAGING DIRECTOR, SINGARENIBHAVAN, RED HILLS, HYDERABAD. 2. THE A P C P D C L OPERATION, REP BY ITS SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, KURNOOL. 3. THE DIVISIONAL ENGINEER OPERATION, A.P.C.P.D.C.L., NANDYAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari calling for No.DE/O/NDL/IAO/ADM/C2/D.No.1319/05, dt.19-5-2005 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to sanction the periodical increments with arrears which are due during the period of suspension and also direct the respondents to fix the new revised pay scales in favour of the petitioner, and to pass such other order or orders. IA NO: 1 OF 2005(WPMP 23165 OF 2005 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to sanction the periodical increments with arrears, which are due during the period of Suspension and to fix the new revised pay scales in favour of the petitioner, pending disposal of the writ petition before this Hon'ble Court and to pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K SITA RAM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. Venkata Rama Rao Kota SC FOR APSPDCL 2. V R REDDY KOVVURI(SC FOR APSPDCL) 3. Y NAGI REDDY The Court made the following: ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and has become infructuous. Recording the said submissions, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 04th September, 2025 RKS