1 2025:CGHC:32473-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 2186 of 2025 Bhaskar Trivedi S/o Late Shri Bharat Nath Dwivedi Aged About 36 Years R/o Plot No. 04, C, Vijay Homes, Amethiya Nagar, Po And Ps Naamkum, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand, Pin - 834010 ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Sho Ps Mahila Thana, Sector 6, Bhilai, District- Durg (C.G.) 2 - Saloni Mishra W/o Bhaskar Trivedi Aged About 35 Years D/o Upendra Nath Mishra, R/o New Rajendra Nagar, Ps- Urla, Raipur, District- Raipur, (Chhattisgarh) ... Respondent(s) (Cause title is taken from CIS) For Petitioner : Mr. Pushp Kumar Gupta, Advocate For Respondent/ State : Mr. Nitansh Jaiswal, Panel Lawyer Hon’ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon’ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Judgment on Board SOURABH BHILWAR Digitally signed by SOURABH BHILWAR Date: 2025.07.15 10:41:22 +0530 2 Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 14/07/2025 1. Heard Mr. Pushp Kumar Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Nitansh Jaiswal, learned Panel Lawyer for the respondent/ State. 2. The petitioner has filed this petition praying for following relief:- “It is, therefore, prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow the present petition by setting aside order framing charges dated 23.07.2022 (ANNEXURE P/1) passed by Ld. Judicial Magistrate Class-1 Raipur, in Criminal Case No. 5266/2020 and chargesheet bearing No. 51/2020 with order taking cognizance dated 17.12.2020 arising out of FIR bearing No. 318/2019 registered at PS Urla, District Raipur (CG) registered against the present Petitioner under Section 498A, 506 and 34 of IPC and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961.” 3. At the time of hearing, this Court has observed that the petitioner has filed the present petition without appropriate prayer which is defective one, therefore, we are not inclined to entertain the present petition with such a vague and sketchy prayer as there is original settlement deed has not been annexed to which learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file afresh with proper prayer and documents. 4. Learned State counsel has no objection. 3 5. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty, as prayed for subject to depositing a sum of Rs. 2,000/- as cost by the petitioner in the Registry of this Court and the said amount shall be transmitted to the Government Multi- Disabled Home, Village Pendri, District- Janjgir- Champa (C.G.). 6. Certified copy of the documents annexed in the petition, if any, may be returned back to the counsel for the petitioner/ State after obtaining the photocopy of the same. - Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice $ Bhilwar/ Jyoti