SRI SRIKRISHNA BOLILLAYA v. SRI MULLAI MUHILAN M P
CCC/1056/2024 · 2025-01-30
M I Arun
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 33910 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 33910 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:4233-DB CCC No. 1056 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR N. V. ANJARIA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 1056 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
1.
SRI SRIKRISHNA BOLILLAYA S/O. VASUDEVA BOLILLAYA AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS THE HEREDITARY MANAGING TRUSTEE SRI KINNIMANI POOMANI DAIVASTANAM ARALAPADAVAU PUTTUR TALUK, D.K.- 574 259.
…COMPLAINANT (BY SRI RAJARAMA S., ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
SRI MULLAI MUHILAN M.P.
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OFFICE AT DEPUTY COMMISSIONER'S OFFICE BUILDING, STATE BANK ROAD MANGALORE D.K. -575 008.
2.
SRI HARSHAVERDHANA S.J.
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER
Digitally signed by H K HEMA Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:4233-DB CCC No. 1056 of 2024
HINDU CHARITABLE AND ENDOWMENT TRUST DEPARTMENT OFFICE AT DEPUTY COMMISSIONER'S OFFICE BUILDING, STATE BANK ROAD MANGALORE, D.K. -575 008.
3.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS UNDER SECRETARY MUZRAI DEPARTMENT M.S. BUILDING AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU-01.
…ACCUSED (BY SMT. PRAMODHINI KISHAN, AGA)
THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 11 AND 12 OF CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971 READ WITH ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO INITIATE CONTEMPT OF COURT PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE ACCUSED FOR HAVING VIOLATED THE ORDER IN WRIT PETITION NO.29004/2023 (GM-RES) DATED 29.05.2024 VIDE ANNEXURE-A, PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE N. V. ANJARIA and HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC:4233-DB CCC No. 1056 of 2024
ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE N. V. ANJARIA)
Learned advocate Mr. S. Rajarama for the complainant states that the order under contempt is complied with.
2. Learned Additional Government Advocate Smt. Pramodhini Kishan for the respondents files memo of compliance, which is taken on record.
3. In that view, the contempt petition does not survive. It is accordingly disposed of.
Sd/- (N. V. ANJARIA) CHIEF JUSTICE
Sd/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE
VMB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 35