Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3391 (KAR)

SRI. SHIVANAND S/O SHIVALINGAYYA YEKKERIMATH ALIAS VIBHUTI v. SANDEEP UPPAR

CCC/100044/2025 · 2025-03-21

G Basavaraja, Sachin Shankar Magadum

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5216-DB CCC No. 100044 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF MARCH, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 100044 OF 2025 BETWEEN: SRI. SHIVANAND, S/O. SHIVALINGAYYA YEKKERIMATH @ VIBHUTI AGE. 65 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE AND ADVOCATE, DIVATGERI ONI, SAVADATTI-591126, TQ. SAVADATTI, DIST. BELAGAVI. …COMPLAINANT (BY SRI. LAXMAN T. MANTAGANI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SANDEEP UPPAR THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS SAVADATTI 591126, TQ. SAVADATTI, DIST. BELAGAVI. …ACCUSED VISHAL NINGAPPA PATTIHAL Digitally signed by VISHAL NINGAPPA PATTIHAL Date: 2025.03.25 16:16:22 +0530 - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5216-DB CCC No. 100044 of 2025 2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA ..PROFARMA RESPONDENT (BY SRI.G.K.HIREGOUDAR, GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE FOR A2) THIS CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971, R/W. ARTICLE 215 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1950, PRAYING TO, INITIATE CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971, AND PUNISH THE ACCUSED NO.1 FOR WILLFUL AND DELIBERATE NON-COMPLIANCE WITH THE ORDER PASSED BY THIS HON’BLE COURT IN W.P. NO.104235/2024 (KLR-RES) DATED 22/07/2024 AND ISSUE ANY OTHER ORDER OR DIRECTION AS THIS HON’BLE COURT DEEMS FIT, IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5216-DB CCC No. 100044 of 2025 ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM) The counsel appearing for the complainant and the learned Principal Government Advocate on instructions have brought to the notice of this Court that in compliance of the order passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in W.P. No.104235/2025, the concerned authorities have accomplished the phodi proceedings. However, the complainant is required to remit the prescribed fee by tendering online application. Counsel appearing for the complainant on instructions submits that complainant will tender online application within a period of two weeks including requisite fees. If such an application is tendered online with requisite fees, the authorities shall forthwith issue the PT sheet and all other relevant records. Two weeks’ time is granted to the complainant to tender online application. On receipt of such online application with all other requisite documents and fees, - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5216-DB CCC No. 100044 of 2025 the authorities thereafter within four weeks shall issue the PT sheet. In the light of the statement made by both the counsel, the contempt proceedings do not survive for consideration. Accordingly, the contempt petition is hereby disposed of. Sd/- (SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM) JUDGE Sd/- (G BASAVARAJA) JUDGE RSH / Ct-cmu LIST NO.: 2 SL NO.: 11