MRS ZAIBA NISHATH BANNO v. MR MOHAMMED KHALID EBADULLA
WP/27430/2024 · 2025-06-30
M Nagaprasanna
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 33906 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 33906 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22935 WP No. 27430 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 27430 OF 2024 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN:
MRS. ZAIBA NISHATH BANNO, W/O MR. RIAZ AHMED, D/O LATE ABDUL KHALIQ, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.33/1, RASHTRIYA VIDYALAYA ROAD, BASAVANAGUDI, BENGALURU – 560 004, REPRESENTED BY HER HUSBAND AND POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER MR. RIAZ AHMED. …PETITIONER (BY SRI KEERTHI PRASAD D. C., ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
MR. MOHAMMED KHALID EBADULLA, S/O LATE ABDUL KHALIQ, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/AT NO.205, ELAGANCE BRINDAVAN APARTMENT, 7TH MAIN, 36TH ‘B’ CROSS 4TH BLOCK, JAYANAGAR, BANGALURU – 560 041.
2.
MR. MOHAMMED SAHID KALEEMULLA, S/O LATE ABDUL KHALIQ, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/AT NO.301, NO.67, AYESHATRANQUILL, MOSQUE ROAD, BASAVANAGUDI, BENGALURU – 560 004.
Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22935 WP No. 27430 of 2024
3.
THE COMMISSIONER, BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE, N.R.SQUARE, BENGALURU – 560 002. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI G.V.SUDHAKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2;
SRI BATHE GOWDA K. V., ADVOCATE FOR R3)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 02-03-2024 IN OS NO.5528/18 PASSED BY XXIX ADDL.
CITY CIVIL AND SESSION JUDGE, BENGALURU (CCH 30) VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND CONSEQUENTLY ALLOW IA NO.3 FILED BY THE PETITIONER U/O VI RULE 17 R/W SECTION 151 OF CPC VIDE ANNEXURE-A
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the suit itself is disposed. In that light, the petition is rendered infructuous. In view of the above, the petition is disposed as having become infructuous.
Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE
CBC/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 72 CT:SS