PRAVEEN CHANDER SINGH AND OTHERS v. THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS
CWP/18720/2025 · 2025-12-09
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 33902 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 33902 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No.18720 of 2025
Decided on: 09.12.2025 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Praveen Chander Singh and Ors
…..Petitioners
Versus
State of H.P. and Anr
.....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioners: Mr. R.L.Chaudhary, Advocate.
18720 For the Respondents: Mr. Y. P. S. Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
Notice. Mr. Y.P.S.Dhaulta,
learned Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents.
2.
With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is heard at this stage.
3.
Petitioners’ grievance is that their representation dated 06.06.2025 (Annexure P-3) seeking applicability of State of H.P. and Ors Vs. Rakesh Chand2 have not been decided till date by the respondents/competent authority.
1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes.
2 LPA No. 105 of 2010 decided alongwith connected matters on 13.12.20212
2
Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners would be content in case the respondents/competent authority(s) are
directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representation in accordance with law within a fixed-time schedule. Learned Additional Advocate General is not averse to this prayer.
4.
Having regard to the afore-submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents/ competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioners in accordance with law as well as taking into consideration the above judgment in the case of Rakesh Chand2 within a period of six weeks from today. The decision so arrived at shall also be communicated to the petitioners.
The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua December 09, 2025
Judge R.Atal