( 2025:JHHC:31403 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No.1883 of 2025 ------ 1. Firdous Ansari @ Firdos Ansari, S/o Alam Ansari, aged about 27 years, 2. Alam Ansari S/o Kurban Ansari, aged about 52 years, 3. Nayeem Ansari @ Naeem Ansari @ Nayum Mian, aged about 57 years, 4. Abbas Ansari, aged about 55 years, Sl.No.3 & 4 are sons of Asgar Mian. 5. Iliyas Ansari, aged about 33 years, 6. Jamshed Ansari, aged about 30 years, Sl.No.5 & 6 are sons of Lukman Ansari. 7. Saddam Ansari, aged about 27 years, 8. Aftab Ansari, aged about 24 years, Sl.No.7 & 8 are sons of Zakir Ansari. 9. Israfil Ansari, aged about 27 years, 10. Siddique Ansari, aged about 34 years, 11. Mahtab Ansari, aged about 25 years, Sl.No.9 to 11 are sons of Nayeem Ansari. All residents of village & P.O.-Chaingadda, P.S.-Patratu, District- Ramgarh. … Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Sanjay Karmali S/o Late Jitu Karmali, residents of Village & P.O.- Chaingadda, P.S.-Patratu, District-Ramgarh. … Opposite Parties ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Jitesh Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shiv Shankar Kumar, Addl.P.P. ------ Order No:-03 Dated:-10-10-2025 Heard the parties. This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed by the petitioners with a prayer for restoration of Criminal Appeal (S.J.) No.210 of 2024 to its original file which stood dismissed for non- compliance of peremptory order dated 31.08.2024. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that Criminal Appeal (S.J.) No.210 of 2024 stood dismissed for non- compliance of peremptory order dated 31.08.2024 of filing the interlocutory application for delay of condonation within two weeks. It is next submitted that inadvertently, the learned counsel for the petitioners could not inform to the pairvikar for filing of the interlocutory application, as such the petitioners could not file the said interlocutory application within the stipulated time; which resulted in dismissal of the said Criminal Appeal (S.J.) No.210 of 2024 for non- compliance of peremptory order dated 31.08.2024. It is next submitted that non-compliance of peremptory order dated 31.08.2024 was neither deliberate nor intentional. It is also submitted that the petitioners have very good grounds to agitate in the said Criminal Appeal (S.J.) No.210 of 2024 and unless the same is restored to its original file, the petitioners will be highly prejudiced. Hence, it is submitted that the Criminal Appeal (S.J.) No.210 of 2024 be restored to its original file. Learned counsel appearing for the State has not raised any serious objection. Considering the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners and the facts of this case, Criminal Appeal (S.J.) No.210 of 2024 is directed to be restored to its original file at the same stage at which it was before its dismissal. Registry is directed to list Criminal Appeal (S.J.) No.210 of 2024 before the concerned Bench after a week. This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is disposed of accordingly. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 10/10/2025 Abhiraj/