M/s. Flokart India Private Limited v. THE SUPERINTENDENT
WP/8969/2025 · 2025-03-20
Krishnan Ramasamy
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 33894 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 33894 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
W.P.No.8969 of 2025 and W.M.P.Nos.10077 & 10078 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated : 20.03.2025 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY W.P.No.8969 of 2025 and W.M.P.Nos.10077 & 10078 of 2025 M/s.Flokart India Private Limited, Rep. by its Director Mr.Satish Mohan Reddy, 3rd Floor, T1, Rama Anjaneya Garden, Salamangalam, Padappai, Kancheepuram – 601 301. .. Petitioner Vs. The Superintendent, Oragadam Circle, Mambakkam Range, Sriperumbudur Range, Sriperumbudur Division, Chennai Outer Commissionerate, Chennai. .. Respondent Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, pleased to issue Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order passed vide Ref.No.ZA3304240687686 dated 16.04.2024 and direct the respondent to revoke the cancellation of GSTIN 33AAFCF3791D1ZT. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Mansoor Ilahi 1/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.8969 of 2025 and W.M.P.Nos.10077 & 10078 of 2025 For Respondent : Mr.B.Ramanakumar Senior Standing counsel
ORDER This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the
order dated 16.04.2024 passed by the respondent, cancelling the petitioner's GST registration. 2.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that due to the financial constraints, the petitioner had not filed the GST returns for a tax period 2023-24. Under these circumstances, the GST Registration of the petitioner was cancelled by the respondent vide order dated 16.04.2024. 3.Further, he would submit that the petitioner is willing to file his GST returns and pay the entire tax liabilities along with applicable interest and penalty, if any. Hence, he requests this Court to revoke the order passed by the respondent for cancellation of GST Registration of the petitioner. 4.In reply, the learned Senior Standing counsel for the respondent 2/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.8969 of 2025 and W.M.P.Nos.10077 & 10078 of 2025 confirms that the GST registration of the petitioner was cancelled by the respondent vide impugned order dated 16.04.2024 and requests this Court to pass an appropriate order. 5.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Senior Standing counsel for the respondent and also perused the materials available on record. 6.In this case, the GST registration of the petitioner was cancelled by the respondent vide the impugned order dated 16.04.2024. According to the petitioner, due to financial constraints, he was unable to run his business and hence, he had failed to file his returns for the tax period 2023-2024. The reason provided for non-compliance with the relevant provisions of the Act within the prescribed time, in the considered opinion of this Court, appears to be genuine. 7.In view of the above, this Court is inclined to revoke the impugned 3/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.8969 of 2025 and W.M.P.Nos.10077 & 10078 of 2025
order passed by the respondent canceling the GST registration of the petitioner. The cancellation of registration is hereby revoked, subject to the fulfillment of the following conditions: (i) The respondent shall take suitable steps by instructing GST Network, New Delhi to make suitable changes in the architecture of the GST Web portal to allow the petitioner to file the returns and to pay the tax/penalty/fine, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. (ii) The petitioner is directed to file returns for the period till date, if not filed, together with tax dues along with interest thereon and the fee fixed for belated filing of returns within a period of 4 weeks from the date of restoration of GST Registration of the petitioner. (iii) It is made clear that such payment of tax, interest, fine/fee etc. shall not be allowed to be made or adjusted from and out of any Input Tax Credit (ITC) which may be lying unutilized or unclaimed in the hands of the petitioner. (iv) If any ITC has remained unutilized, it shall not be utilised until it is scrutinized and approved by an appropriate 4/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.8969 of 2025 and W.M.P.Nos.10077 & 10078 of 2025 or competent officer of the Department. (v) Only such approved ITC shall be allowed to be utilized thereafter for discharging future tax liability under the Act and Rules. (vi) If any ITC was earned, it shall be allowed to be utilised only after scrutinising and approving by the respondent or any other competent authority. (vii) If any of the aforesaid conditions is not complied with by the petitioner, the benefit granted under this order will automatically ceased to operate. 8.With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No cost. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are also closed. 20.03.2025 rst Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation: Yes/No To: 5/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.8969 of 2025 and W.M.P.Nos.10077 & 10078 of 2025 The Superintendent, Oragadam Circle, Mambakkam Range, Sriperumbudur Range, Sriperumbudur Division, Chennai Outer Commissionerate, Chennai. 6/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.8969 of 2025 and W.M.P.Nos.10077 & 10078 of 2025 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J. 7/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.8969 of 2025 and W.M.P.Nos.10077 & 10078 of 2025 rst W.P.No.8969 of 2025 and W.M.P.Nos.10077 & 10078 of 2025 20.03.2025 8/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis