Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33893 (PNJ)

PARAMJIT KAUR v. STATE OF PUNJAB

CRM-M/14008/2025 · 2025-03-27

Namit Kumar

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 209 CRM-M-65633-2024 Date of decision : 27.03.2025 Daljit Singh ….Petitioner V/S State of Punjab ….Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR Present: Ms. G.S. Chanota, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Anup Singh, A.A.G., Punjab. Ms. Himani Kapila, Advocate with Mr. Rajesh Kapila, Advocate for the complainant. **** NAMIT KUMAR , J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioner has filed the instant petition under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of anticipatory bail in FIR No.102 dated 22.09.2024 registered under Sections 85, 316(2) & 318(4) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 at Police Station Shri Hargobindpur (Batala), District Gurdaspur. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that, in pursuance to the order dated 01.01.2025 passed by this Court, the petitioner has appeared before the Investigating Officer and has joined the investigation. 3. Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Kartar Singh, has not disputed the aforesaid fact and submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation and is no more required for further investigation. Vinod Kothiyal 2025.03.27 19:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document CRM-M-65633-2024 -2- 4. In view of the above, the present petition is allowed and the interim bail granted to the petitioner vide order dated 01.01.2025 is made absolute subject to the conditions envisaged under Section 438(2) of Cr.P.C./482(2) of BNSS, 2023. 27.03.2025 (NAMIT KUMAR) kothiyal JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No Vinod Kothiyal 2025.03.27 19:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document