1 2025:CGHC:35086 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 7506 of 2025 1 - Monika Shyam D/o Shrawan Kumar Shyam Aged About 35 Years Occupation Service Presently Posted And Working As Rural Health Co- Ordinator, Sub Health Center, Jarve (B), Block Baloda, District Janjgir Champa (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department Of Health And Family Welfare, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Director Directorate Of Health Services, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Collector Janjgir Champa District Janjgir Champa (C.G.) 4 - Chief Medical And Health Officer Janjgir Champa, District Janjgir Champa (C.G.) 5 - Civil Surgeon Cum Chief Hospital Superintendent District Hospital, Janjgir, District Janjgir Champa (C.G.) 6 - Smt. Ujala Kanwar Rural Health Co-Ordinator, Sub Health Center, Birgahni (Ch), District Janjgir Champa (C.G.) ---- Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vikas Kumar Pandey, Advocate For Respondent(s)/State : Mr. Sabyasachi Choubey, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice R avindra Kumar Agrawal VEDPRAKASH DEWANGAN Digitally signed by VEDPRAKASH DEWANGAN Date: 2025.07.24 11:33:32 +0530 2 Order on Board 22/07/2025 1. Challenge in this petition is the order of transfer dated 30.06.2025, whereby the petitioner has been transferred from Jarve (B) to Birgahni (Ch). 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that, against the said transfer order the petitioner has already made representation, which is still pending before the transfer committee. As per Clause 8 of the transfer policy dated 05.06.2025, there is in-house remedy for making representation against the transfer order before the transfer committee, who will consider the grievance of the petitioner in accordance with law. Clause 8 of the said transfer policy dated 05.06.2025 is reproduced as below:- “8. स्थानांतरण से व्यथिथत शासकीय सेवक द्वारा अपने स्थानांतरण के विवरूद्ध अभ्यावेदन के वल स्थानांतरण नीतित के उल्लंघन होने पर ही उक्त उल्लंघन होने वाले कं ति$का के संबंध में स्पष्ट आधारों के साथ स्थानांतरण आदेश जारी होने की तितथिथ से 15 विदवस के भीतर प्रश्नाधीन स्थानांतरण आदेश की प्रतित सविहत शासन द्वारा गवि1त वरिरष्ठ सति4वों की सविमतित के संयोजक एवं सति4व, सामान्य प्रशासन विवभाग को प्रस्तुत विकया जा सके गा। सविमतित द्वारा ऐसे प्रकरणों का इस स्थानांतरण नीतित के प्रकाश में परीक्षण करने के पश्चात अपनी अनुशंसा संबतिधत विवभाग को प्रेवि=त की जाएगी।” 3. Be that as it may, since in-house remedy has been provided to the employee concerned to raise the grievances before the transfer committee against transfer order, this Court deem it appropriate to direct the petitioner to move fresh representation before the transfer committee along with copy of this order within a week from the date of receipt of 3 copy of this order and the transfer committee, in turn, shall take a decision on the representation, so made by the petitioner, in accordance with law, in an objective manner and pass a reasoned order, on its own merits, within a further period of two weeks. Till then no coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioner. 4. The petitioner is directed to produce a copy of this order within a week from today to the said transfer committee. 5. The writ petition, accordingly, stands disposed of with the aforesaid observation and direction. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge ved