Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33881 (CHH)

SMT. SUNITA PATEL v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/6186/2021 · 2025-03-18

Shri Narendra Kumar Vyas

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:12867 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6186 of 2021 1 - Smt. Sunita Patel D/o Late Shri Yogendra Patel Aged About 41 Years R/o Village Chhewaripali, Post Manikpur, Bade Vikaskhand Baramkela, District Raigarh (Chhattisgarh), District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh .. Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Panchayat And Rural Development Department, Mantralaya, New Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh), District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - The Collector Dhamtari, District - Dhamtari (Chhattisgarh), District : Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh 3 - Add. Chief Executive Officer, District Panchayat Raigarh, District - Raigarh (Chhattisgarh), District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh 4 - Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Dharamjaygarh, District - Raigarh (Chhattisgarh), District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh 5 - The District Education Officer Raigarh, District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Tarun Dansena, Advocate. For State : Mr. Tarkeshwar Nande, Panel Lawyer. For Res. No. 3 & 4 : Mr. Ashish Tiwari, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order On Board 18.03.2025 1. This petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging order dated 24.03.2021 passed by respondent No. 4 by which claim of the petitioner for grant of compassionate appointment has been rejected. 2. Learned counsel for respondent No. 3 & 4 would submit that the petitioner has been granted compassionate appointment vide order dated 17.03.2025 and she has been posted at Govt. Primary School Aadarsh Behrapara, Block- Dharamjaigarh, District- Raigarh (C.G.). ARUN KUMAR DEWANGAN Digitally signed by ARUN KUMAR DEWANGAN Date: 2025.03.19 11:08:26 +0530 2 3. Considering the aforesaid submission made by learned counsel for respondent No. 3 & 4 that grievance of the petitioner has already been redressed, nothing is required to be adjudicated by this Court at this stage. 4. Accordingly, this writ petition stands disposed of. 5. Order dated 17.03.2025 submitted by learned counsel for respondents No. 3 & 4 is taken on record. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Arun