Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3388 (GAU)

ISLAM UDDIN v. THE UNION OF INDIA AND 8 ORS

WP(C)/232/2025 · 2026-06-01

Soumitra Saikia

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010271802024 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/232/2025 ISLAM UDDIN S/O LATE JAHUR ALI, R/O VILL- HARI NAGAR PT-II, P.O.-RAJARTILLA, DIST-SRIBHUMI, ASSAM VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND 8 ORS REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF JAL SHAKTI, GOVT. OF INDIA, 4TH FLOOR, CGO COMPLEX, LODHI ROAD, NEW DELHI-110003 2:THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM PUBLIC HEALTH ENGINEER DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-06 3:THE CHIEF ENGINEER (PHE) WATER ASSAM HENGRABARI GUWAHATI-36 4:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER SRIBHUMI P.O. AND DIST- SRIBHUMI PIN-788710 5:THE DISTRICT MISSION DIRECTOR (JJM) CUM EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PHE SRIBHUMI DIVISION AT SRIBHUMI P.O. AND DIST- SRIBHUMI Page No.# 2/3 PIN-788710 6:THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER SRIBHUMI ZILLA PARISHAD P.O. AND DIST- SRIBHUMI PIN-788710 7:THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER BADARPUR DEVELOPMENT BLOCK MAHAKAL P.O.-BADARPUR DIST- SRIBHUMI PIN-788701 8:THE SECRETARY OF BUNDASHIL GAON PANCHAYAT ALEKARGUL BADARPUR P.O.-ANGALAR BAZAR DIST- SRIBHUMI PIN-788806 9:THE WATER USER COMMITTEE BADARPUR BAZAR PIPE WATER SUPPLY SCHEME REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT MONJUR AHMED S/O LATE ABDUR RAHMAN R/O VILL- KHADIMAN P.O.-BADARPURGAHT DIST- SRIBHUMI ASSAM PIN-78880 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M KHAN, MS J AKTAR,MR A K DAS Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I., MS. D. DEVI(R-9),MR. K R PATGIRI (R-9),SC, P H E,GA, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA ORDER 02.06.2026 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Page No.# 3/3 The matter was referred to mediation by order dated 24.02.2026. Before the Mediator, the parties appeared. As per the mediation report, on the request made by the parties, some further time was sought for and accordingly, the matter was deferred. Today when the matter is called up, the learned counsel for the parties submit that the matter has been settled out of Court and the writ petitioner does not wish to proceed any further in the writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed. Interim order in any stands recalled. Pending IA is any stands dismissed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant