2025:CGHC:31885 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 7447 of 2025 Chandrashekhar Sahu S/o Tritram Sahu, Aged About 50 Years Presently Working As Lecturer (Mathematic) At Natthu Ji Jagtap Higher Secondary School Dhamtari, District Dhamtari (C.G.). ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Director, Directorate Of Public Instruction, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.). 3 - Joint Director, Education Division Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 4 - Collector, District Dhamtari (C.G.). 5 - District Education Officer, Dhamtari, District Dhamtari (C.G.). 6 - Block Education Officer, Dhamtari, District Dhamtari (C.G.) 7 - Principal, Natthu Ji Jagtap Higher Secondary School Dhamtari, District Dhamtari (C.G.). ...Respondents (Cause title is taken from the CIS) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Petitioner : Shri Tapan Kumar Chandra, Advocate For Respondents/State : Shri Mayur Khandelwal, PL ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 10.07.2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that recently the State Government has issued a notification dated 07.07.2025 by which a Committee is constituted for redressal of the grievances of the employees whose representation has been decided by the authority concerned and according to the said notification dated 07.07.2025, the petitioner has to approach before the Divisional Level Digitally signed by V PADMAVATHI Date: 2025.07.11 17:20:29 +0530 Wps 7447 of 2025 2 Committee headed by the Divisional Commissioner, and therefore, he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition with liberty to approach before the Committee concerned and the said Committee may be directed to decide the representation of the petitioner within a stipulated time frame. 2. On the other hand, learned counsel for the State though opposes on merits, but has not raised any objection if such a direction is issued to approach before the Committee concerned and then the Committee will decide the representation of the petitioner within a stipulated time frame. 3. On due consideration on the submission made by learned counsel for the parties, the present writ petition is disposed of reserving liberty in favour of the petitioner to approach before the said Rationalization Committee constituted by the State Government vide notification dated 07.07.2025, and if such representation is made by the petitioner against the order passed by the authority concerned on the representation, the said Committee shall decide the representation of the petitioner in objective manner in accordance with law, as early as possible. 4. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the present writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) JUDGE padma