Kanikipati Srikanth v. Kanikipati @ Cheni Navya Saranya,
CRP/2624/2023 · 2025-06-26
T C D Sekhar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 33866 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 33866 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010514602023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI -7 FRIDAY THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JUNE If li > O {*l C’> TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE k f i- PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2624 OF 2023 under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,Civil Revision Petition Petition being aggrieved by the Docket Order dt. 22.8.2023 passed in GOP NO. 508 of 2022 on the file of Hon'ble 1st Add. District Judge, Nellore. Between: Kanikipati Srikanth, S/o.Yedukondalu, Hindu, Aged about 36 years, Hindu, aged about 36 years, C/o. My Account on line software's Pvt Ltd 1-98/8/c/18, Vasuki Chandini Jewels, Jaihind Layout, Near Plot No. 1/B, Flat No. 201 Image Garden Function Hall, Madapur, Telangana State. ...Petitioner/REspondents AND Kanikipati @ Cheni Navya Saranya, W/o. Kanikipati Srikanth Hndu, Aged about 29 years, HNo. 9-14-4, Pusalavari Street, Near Venkateswara Theater, Kav&li Town, SPSR Nellore District ...Respondent/Petitioner
m lA NO: 1 OF 2Q2a Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in GOP No.508/2022 on the file of Hon’ble 1st Addl. District Judge, Nellore pending disposal of the above CRP Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI T C KRISHNAN Counsel for the Respondent: The Court made the following order:
APHC010514602023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3505] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2624/2023 Between: Kanikipati Srikanth ...PETITIONER AND Kanikipati Cheni Navya Saranya Counsel for the Petitioner: ...RESPONDENT 1.TC KRISHNAN Counsel for the Respondent:
1. The Court made the following order: It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the cause in the revision petition does not survive. 2. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is placed on record. 3. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous application pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- K TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// ■\ SECTION/OFFICER To,
1. The 1st Addl. District Judge, Nellore
2. One CC to Sri. T C Krishnan, Advocate [OPUC]
3. The Section Officer, V.R Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. 4.
Two CD Copies MKP vna
HIGH COURT DATED:27/06/2025 ORDER CRP NO. 2624 OF 2023 »a DISMISSING THE CIVIL REVISION PETITION INFRUCTUOUS AS