Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33865 (RAJ)

RAMRAJ S/O PANCHURAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/15042/2024 · 2025-01-09

Ganesh Ram Meena

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:1296] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 15042/2024 Ramraj S/o Panchuram, Aged About 56 Years, R/o Basani, Police Station Hindoli, Distt. Bundi (Raj.) (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In District Jail, Bundi). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vijendra Yadav For Respondent(s) : Mr. Onkar Singh Rajpurohit, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 09/01/2025 1. This bail application has been filed by the accused-petitioner under Section 483 B.N.S.S., in connection with F.I.R. No.254/2024 registered at Police Station Hindoli, District Bundi for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 143, 332, 353 & 392 of IPC. 2. Heard. 3. Considered the submissions made at Bar and also perused the challan papers as well as the order of framing charges against the accused-petitioner. 4. On consideration of the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner and on perusal of the record, this Court finds that the accused-petitioner has been charged for offences under Sections 323, 324, 332, 353, 333 & 307 of IPC with the aid of Section 149 of IPC. [2025:RJ-JP:1296] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-15042/2024] 5. Charges for offences under Section 394 of IPC and Section 3/25 of the Arms Act have been framed against the accused- petitioner, as a simpliciter charges. Co-accused persons have also been enlarged on bail by this Court vide orders dated 08.11.2024 & 22.07.2024 passed in Bail Application bearing Nos. 12869/2024, 9924/2024 & 7983/2024, 6. Having regard the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner and so also the fact that co-accused persons against whom same charges have been framed as like the present accused-petitioner, have been released on bail and the fact that the accused-petitioner is in custody since 24.05.2024, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merit and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 7. This bail application is, accordingly, allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court or any other Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J DIVYA SAINI /11