IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 110 Ravinder Kumar Sh. Sujjan Singh, IAS, Director State Transport, Haryana and another CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) proceedings against the respondent(s) for not complying the order dated 25.10.2024 this Court in CWP vs. State of Haryana and another ” vide which the petition was disposed of with a direction representation dated 10.7.2024 (Annexure P afore-referred judgment, expediti the petitioner that in compliance of the order dated 25.10.2024 (Annexure P has been passed by the respondent COCP-1367-2025 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.1367 of 2025 Date of decision : Ravinder Kumar Versus Sh. Sujjan Singh, IAS, Director State Transport, Haryana and CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Naveen Jhajholia, Advocate for Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Priyavrat Parashar, AAG, NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) Prayer in this petition is for initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondent(s) for not complying the order 25.10.2024 (Annexure P-1) passed by a co this Court in CWP-29103-2024 titled as “ vs. State of Haryana and another ” vide which the petition was disposed of with a direction “…to the respondents to decide the representation dated 10.7.2024 (Annexure P referred judgment, expeditiously.” At the very outset, it is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that in compliance of the order dated 25.10.2024 (Annexure P-1) a Speaking Order dated 25.2.2025 (Annexure R has been passed by the respondent-authority whereby the case of the 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 1367 of 2025 (O & M) Date of decision :-06.08.2025 …..Petitioner Sh. Sujjan Singh, IAS, Director State Transport, Haryana and …..Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Naveen Jhajholia, Advocate for Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate Mr. Priyavrat Parashar, AAG, Haryana. Prayer in this petition is for initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondent(s) for not complying the order 1) passed by a co-ordinate Bench of as “Ravinder Kumar and others vs. State of Haryana and another ” vide which the petition was “…to the respondents to decide the representation dated 10.7.2024 (Annexure P-9), taking note of the At the very outset, it is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that in compliance of the order dated 25.10.2024 1) a Speaking Order dated 25.2.2025 (Annexure R-1) authority whereby the case of the VIJAY ASIJA 2025.08.07 18.40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document petitioner has been rejected. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petition may be disposed of, however, liberty may be granted to the petitioner to challenge the said Speaking Order. Vikram Kamboj, General Manager, Haryana Roadways, Panipat has already been filed in the Registry, which is annexed with the file. The same is ordered to be taken on record. learned counsel for the petitioner(s). Regist same at appropriate place in the paper necessary compliance has been made, while passing a speaking order dated 25.2.2025 (Annexure R cause survives in the present petition. passed in the present petition, the same is aforesaid Speaking Order as per August 06 Vijay Asija Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No COCP-1367-2025 (O & M) titioner has been rejected. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petition may be disposed of, however, liberty may be granted to the petitioner to challenge the said Speaking Order. Short reply dated 09.4.2025 by way of affidavit o Vikram Kamboj, General Manager, Haryana Roadways, Panipat has already been filed in the Registry, which is annexed with the file. The same is ordered to be taken on record. learned counsel for the petitioner(s). Regist same at appropriate place in the paper-book. Learned counsel for the respondent necessary compliance has been made, while passing a speaking order dated 25.2.2025 (Annexure R-1) by the respondent cause survives in the present petition. In view of the above, no further orders are required to be passed in the present petition, the same is The petitioner would be at liberty to challenge the aforesaid Speaking Order as per law. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. 6, 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No 2 titioner has been rejected. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petition may be disposed of, however, liberty may be granted to the petitioner to challenge the said Speaking Order. Short reply dated 09.4.2025 by way of affidavit of Shri Vikram Kamboj, General Manager, Haryana Roadways, Panipat has already been filed in the Registry, which is annexed with the file. The same is ordered to be taken on record. Copy thereof is supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner(s). Registry to tag/paginate the book. Learned counsel for the respondent-State submits that necessary compliance has been made, while passing a speaking order 1) by the respondent-authority; thus, no In view of the above, no further orders are required to be passed in the present petition, the same is disposed of accordingly. The petitioner would be at liberty to challenge the Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2025.08.07 18.40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document