Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33859 (KAR)

SRI V RAJANNA v. SRI L P MANJUNATHA

RFA/2077/2022 · 2025-01-17

Jyoti Mulimani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:1989 RFA No. 2077 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 2077 OF 2022 (INJ) BETWEEN: 1. SRI V.RAJANNA S/O LATE VENKATARAJU, AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS, 2. SRI SANJAY RAJU S/O V.RAJANNA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, WORKING IN VIJAYA BANK, APPELLANTS NO.1 AND 2 ARE R/AT NO 593, 42ND CROSS, 10TH 'A' MAIN ROAD, JAYANAGAR 5TH BLOCK, BENGALURU-560 041. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. SRIKANTH.M.P., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: 1. SRI L.P.MANJUNATHA S/O LAKSHMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/AT NO 35, 3RD CROSS, 3RD MAIN, 1ST BLOCK, JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU-560 011. 2. SMT. HEMALATHA.K W/O H.LAKSHMANGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, HOUSE WIFE, R/AT NO.21, Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:1989 RFA No. 2077 of 2022 4TH MAIN ROAD, J.P.NAGAR, 3RD PHASE, BENGALURU-560 078. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. VEDA MURTHY.M.V., ADVOCATE C/R2) THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF THE CPC, 1908. THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER When the case is called, the appellants are not represented. When the case is listed and is called out, the advocate must be present. His absence may affect the case. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the appeal was listed on 06.01.2025, on that day, finally a week’s time was granted to comply with the office objections, failing which the office was directed to list the appeal under the caption ‘for dismissal of appeal for non-compliance of office objections’ on 17.01.2025. The appeal is listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal of appeal for non-compliance of office objections’. Despite granting sufficient time, the appellants have not complied with the office objections. It appears that the appellants are not - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:1989 RFA No. 2077 of 2022 interested in prosecuting the appeal. In view of peremptory order dated 06.01.2025, the appeal is dismissed for non- prosecution and also for non-compliance of office objections. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4