Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33859 (AP)

M/S ATLAS OFFSHORE SERVICES PVT. LTD., & ANOTHER, v. UNION OF INDIA, REP. SEYC.,MINISTRY AFFAIRS,NEW DELHI, & 4

WP/14325/2014 · 2025-09-07

Sumathi Jagadam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010513112014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] MONDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 14325/2014 Between: 1. M/S ATLAS OFFSHORE SERVICES PVT. LTD., & ANOTHER,, A COMPANY INCORPORATED AS U05003AP2008PTC061555, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT D.NO.16-42-41/4, GROUND FLOOR, BESIDE SAGAR PUBLIC SCHOOL, PALLAMRAJU NAGAR (WEST), KAKINADA - 533001, REP. BY ITS PROMOTER AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, DODLA ANANTH REDDY, S/O. CHANDRA KIRAN REDDY AGED 37 YEARS, D.NO.16-42-41/4, LST FLOOR, BESIDE SAGAR PUBLIC SCHOOL, PALLAMRAJU NAGAR 2. DODLA ANANTH REDDY,, SIO. CHANDRA KIRAN REDDY, AGED 37 YEARS, D. NO.16-42-41/4 1ST FLOOR, BESIDE SAGAR PUBLIC SCHOOL, PALLAMRAJU NAGAR, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT - 533001 ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. UNION OF INDIA REP SEYC MINISTRY AFFAIRS NEW DELHI 4, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS, NEW DELHI. 2. THE REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES, 2ND FLOOR, KENDRIASADAN, SULTAN BAZAR, HYDERABAD. 3. THE ASST REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES, (V.G.SATHIAMURTHY), 2ND FLOOR, KENDRIASADAN, SULTAN BAZAR, HYDERABAD. 4. SHEIK AHMED ALISHA, S/O. LATE. SRI. AHMED SHERIFF, AGED 40 YEARS, BUSINESS, 70-6-5/6 (70-6-8/5), BESIDE IFFCO AREA OFFICE, NEAR CHODAY APPA RAO, NATURE CURE HOSPITAL, RAMANAYYAPETA MARKET ROAD, BEHIND BOAT CLUB, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 5. SHEIK CHAN BASHA, S/O. LATE AHMED SHERIFF, AGED 34 YEARS, BUSINESS, 16-33, MALLADI SWAMY HOUSE, DOLPHIN COLONY, SAMBAMURTHY NAGAR, NEAR MUNICIPAL SCHOOL, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DIST., ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction, especially one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the notice Dt.1-5-2014 issued by the 31-d respondent, when the matter is sub-judice before competent Civil Court as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to law and without Jurisdiction and violation of Article 300-A of the constitution of India and consequently Set aside the notice Dt.1- 5-2014 issued by the 3rd respondent and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 17824 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings before the 3rd respondent pursuant to the notice Dt.1-5- 2014 issued by the 3rd respondent pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. E V V S RAVI KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA The Court made the following: ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Recording the submission of learned counsel for the petitioners, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 08th September, 2025 RKS