Naresh Kumar @ Titu vs. Shimla Fruit Agency Cr. MP(M) No. 2124 of 2025 18.11.2025 Present: Mr. Atul Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Cr.MP No. 4556 of 2025 Present application has been filed for placing on record the documents in support of the application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. It has been asserted that the applicant was undergoing treatment at PGI, Chandigarh for four to five months and the applicant wants to place the treatment summary on record. Heard. Since the application has been filed on the ground of illness, therefore, the documents are necessary. Accordingly, the present application is allowed and the documents are permitted to be taken on record. Application stands disposed of. Cr.MP No. 2124 of 2025 Present application has been filed for condonation of delay in filing the revision asserting that the revision could not filed within the statutory period because the applicant was undergoing treatment at PGI, Chandigarh. Heard. This averment is duly supported by an affidavit as well as the prescription slips issued by PGI, Chandigarh. Since the illness is a circumstance which is beyond the control of a person, therefore, the applicant had reasonable cause for not filing the petition within the statutory period. Hence, the delay in filing the revision is ordered to be condoned. Present application stands disposed of. Cr. Revision (ST) No. 8114 of 2025 Since the delay in filing the revision has been ordered to be condoned vide separate order passed in Cr.MP(M) No. 2124 of 2025, the revision be registered. Arguments heard. Judgment reserved. (Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 18th November, 2025 (Chander)