Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33852 (CHH)

M/S C P DIESEL v. BANK OF BARODA (EARLIER KNOWN AS DENA BANK)

WPC/3010/2019 · 2025-02-05

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:6516 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3010 of 2019 1. M/s C P Diesel Registered Office At Opposite Vikrant Battery, Ring Road No.2, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2. Mr. Vishal Chauhan Son Of Late Shri Devendra Bahadur Chauhan Aged Adult Flat No. C-107, Block-C, Near Sethans, Opp. To Sath Dukan, Kanchan Ashv Parisar, Deen Dayal Upadhyay Nagar Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioners Versus • Bank Of Baroda (Earlier Known As Dena Bank) Through Chief Manager Opposite Bharat Mata School, Ge Road, Raipur - 492001, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent For Petitioners : None For Respondent : Mr. Ankit Singhal, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 05/02/2025 1. The petitioners have filed this petition seeking the following relief(s):- “10.(i) Order declaring the petitioners as will defaulters (not communicated) and publication dated 30/05/2019 may kindly be quashed as against the petitioners and/or, 10.(ii) Direct the respondent to allow petitioners to argue their case before committee to be represented by legal practitioner / financial consultant, 10.(iii) To allow the cost of this petition with any other appropriate relief(s) may kindly be granted to the petitioner and, 10.(iv) To pass any other or further order(s) deemed fit and necessary in the facts and circumstances of the matter.” Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI 2 2. None for the petitioners even in two rounds. 3. On instruction, Mr. Ankit Singhal, learned counsel appearing for the respondent/Bank would submit that dispute has already been settled between the parties. 4. Having considered the submission made by Mr. Ankit Singhal, the petition is disposed of. 5. However, the petitioners would be at liberty to revive their prayer, if cause of action still subsists. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge vatti