IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Ex. Petition No.1088 of 2025 Decided on 18th November, 2025 Sh. Naresh Kumar …Petitioner Versus HPTDCL and another …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner: Mr. Suraj Verma, Advocate, vice Mr. Vinay Mehta, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Shivank Singh Panta, Advocate. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner informs the Court that the principal amount, to which, the petitioner was entitled to stands paid to him, but interest has not been paid on the delayed payment. 2. On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondents submits that all the dues including interest stands paid to the petitioner on the delayed payment. His statement is taken on record. 2 3. In view of the above, the petition stands disposed of with the observation that if there is any shortfall in payment of interest, the petitioner may approach afresh by way of execution. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge November 18, 2025 (Vinod)