SANTOSH SINGH S/O TRILOKINATH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/15043/2024 · 2025-04-16
Ashutosh Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 33845 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 33845 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:16194] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15043/2024 Santosh Singh S/o Trilokinath, R/o Rajputana Mohalla, Village Gola, Police Station Mangaliyawas, District Ajmer, Presently House No. 12, Gayatri Nagar, Beawar City, Beawar, District Ajmer (Rajasthan). (At Present Confined In District Jail Sikar, District Sikar). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajesh Gadwal, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, Dy.GA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR
Order 16/04/2025
1. The present bail application has been filed by the accused- petitioner under Section 483 of the B.N.S.S, 2023 against the
order dated 14.11.2024 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Sikar (Rajasthan) in connection with FIR No.362/2024, registered at Police Station Kotwali Sikar, District Sikar for the offences punishable under Sections 420 and 406 of IPC ,by which the bail application of the accused-petitioner under Section 483 of the B.N.S.S, 2023 has been dismissed.
2.
Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submitted that the charges against the accused-petitioner are for the offences punishable under Sections 420 and 406 of IPC, which are triable by the learned Judicial Magistrate. Learned counsel further submitted that the charge-sheet has been filed and trial will take
[2025:RJ-JP:16194] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-15043/2024] long time to conclude. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner argued that the accused-petitioner was arrested on 19.09.2024 and since then, he is behind the bars, therefore, the accused- petitioner be granted benefit of bail.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed this bail application and submits that the accused-petitioner by deceitful means has received Rs.30,25,999/- from the complainant in lieu of arranging a new Inovo Hycross vehicle for the complainant. Learned Public Prosecutor further submits that six other criminal cases are also pending against the accused-petitioner, therefore, he should not be granted benefit of bail.
4. Heard learned counsel for the parties and also perused the case diary.
5. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, and considering the fact that the charges levelled against the accused-petitioner are for the offences punishable under Sections 420 & 406 of IPC, which is triable by the learned Judicial Magistrate and also considering the fact that the accused- petitioner is behind the bars since 19.09.2024 as well as considering the fact that the charge-sheet has been filed and trial will take long time to conclude, but without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, this Court deems it proper to allow the bail application filed by the petitioner.
6. Consequently, this bail application filed under Section 483 of the B.N.S.S, 2023 is allowed. It is ordered that accused-petitioner Santosh Singh S/o Trilokinath, arrested in FIR No.362/2024, registered at Police Station Kotwali, District Sikar shall be released
[2025:RJ-JP:16194] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-15043/2024] on bail; provided he furnishes personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- and two solvent attested sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court. Petitioner shall be required to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
(ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J Mohita /43