Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33831 (CHH)

SMT. SHUBHA SURESH v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/3009/2019 · 2025-05-01

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:20084 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3009 of 2019 1. Smt. Shubha Suresh W/o Suresh Thaikat Aged About 45 Years R/o Louts City Talpuri, Bhilai, Tahsil And District Durg, Chhattisgarh 2. Sandhya Ramesh W/o Rajesh Thaikat Aged About 47 Years R/o Louts City Talpuri, Bhilai, Tahsil And District Durg, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Revenue Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2. Collector Of Stamps, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 3. Sub Registrar Registration, Sub Registrar Office, Durg, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 4. Smt. Jessy Sanjay Mathew W/o Late Shri Sanjay V. Mathew Aged About 54 Years R/o MIG 1/995 Amdhi Nagar, Hudaku Bhilai, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 5. Vini S. Mathew D/o Late Shri Sanjay V. Mathew Aged About 29 Years R/o MIG 1/995 Amdhi Nagar, Hudaku Bhilai, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 6. K.C. Rajan S/o Late Shri Charian Kunju Kanju Aged About 60 Years R/o Amdi Nagar Hudaku Bhilai, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioners : Ms. Priyanka Tiwari, Advocate holding the brief of Mr. T.K. Tiwari, Advocate For Respondents No. 1 to 3 : Mr. Dashrath Prajapati, Panel Lawyer Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 01/05/2025 1. The petitioner has filed this petition seeking the following relief(s):- Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI 2 “10.1 That, the Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue of Writ of Mandamus / appropriate writ as to quash the impugned order dated 17/07/2018 (Annexure P-1) passed by respondent no. 2. 10.2 That, any other relief which this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper be awarded in favour of the petitioner. 10.3 Cost of the petition.” 2. Ms. Priyank Tiwari, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition. 3. No objection from other side. 4. Permission granted. 5. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge vatti