[2025:JHHC:31425] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C.M.P. No.433 of 2022 ------ 1. Premchand Rajak, age about 68 years son of Late Dhanik Lal Rajak, 2. Mohan Lal Rajak, age about 64 years, 3. Shankar Rajak, age about 60 years, 4. Kishore Kumar Rajak, age about 54 years, 5. Sanjay Kumar Rajak, age about 48 years, 6. Ajoy Kumar Rajak, age about 46 years, Sl. No.3 to 7 all sons of Late Munnilal Rajak, 7. Nirmala Devi, age about 52 years daughter of Late Munnilal Rajak, 8. Chunnilal Rajak, age about 70 years son of Late Kayee Dhobi, All are resident of college Road, Sahibganj, P.O. & P.S.- Sahibganj, Town, Sub-Division & District- Sahibganj, Jharkhand. … Petitioners Versus 1. Most. Pawna Dhangarin, wife of Late Basant Dhangar, 2. Akhilesh Dhangar, son of Late Basant Dhangar, 3. Most. Punam Devi, daughter of Late Basant Dhangar, 4. Buchia Dhangarin, wife of Late Matra Dhangar, 5. Shankar Dhangar son of Late Matra Dhangar, 6. Shiva @ Shiv Dayal Dhangar son of Late Matra Dhangar, 7. Gudia Devi, 8. Sharita Devi, 9. Anita Kumari, 10. Kusum Kumari, Respondent No.7 to 10 dauther of Late Matra Dhangar, 11. Matru Dhangar, son of Late Ganesh Dhangar, Sl. No. 1 to 11 All are resident of village Pokharia, P.O. & P.S. Borio (Jirwabari), Sub-Division & District Sahibganj, Jharkhand. 12. Mutri Dhangarin, wife of Late Tara Dhangar, 13. Raj Kumar Dhangar, 14. Binod Dhangar, Sl. No. 13 & 14 both sons of Hira Dhangar 15. Most. Fulsaria wife of Late Chhedi Dhangar, Sl. No. 12 to 15 all are resident of village Pokharia, P.O. & P.S. Borio (Jirwabari), Sub-division & District Sahibganj, Jharkhand. 16. The Deputy Commissioner, Sahibganj, P.O., P.S. & District Sahibganj, Jharkhand. … Opposite Parties ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : None For the Opp. Parties : Mr. Sanjay Kr. Tiwari, SC I Mr. Pratiush Lala, Advocate Mr. Ankit Kumar, AC to SC I ------ Order No:-05 Dated:-10-10-2025 No one turns up on behalf of the petitioners in spite of repeated calls. Learned counsel appearing for the opposite parties submits that since there is no merit in this Civil Miscellaneous Petition, hence, the petitioners are not diligent in pursuing this Civil Miscellaneous Petition. Accordingly, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed for default of the petitioners. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:-10.10.2025 Saroj/